International Journal of Translational Research
Join the reviewer community and support rigorous translational research.
Join the Reviewer Pool
We welcome reviewers with expertise in translational science and clinical research.
- Current affiliation and contact details
- Areas of expertise and methodological skills
- Recent publications or clinical experience
- Availability and preferred review load
Include keywords related to translational biology, biomarker development, clinical research, or therapeutic development for accurate matching.
Providing an ORCID iD is optional but helpful for accurate reviewer identification.
Complete profiles improve matching and reduce delays in review assignment.
Reviewer Responsibilities
Timely, confidential reviews support reliable publication decisions.
Reviewers should disclose conflicts of interest and treat manuscripts as confidential documents. If you are temporarily unavailable, notify the editorial office to pause invitations.
Profiles are kept confidential and can be updated at any time by email.
We match reviewers based on subject keywords, methods expertise, and availability.
Reliable response times help the journal sustain the four week review goal.
Areas We Commonly Match
A clear expertise summary improves assignment accuracy.
- Translational receptor signaling and molecular mechanisms
- Clinical research and therapeutic development
- Adrenal and gonadal disorders
- Pharmacology and therapeutic development
If you are comfortable reviewing in additional languages, include this in your profile.
Consistent availability helps the journal maintain review timelines and author satisfaction.
Clear expertise descriptions reduce mismatched review invitations.
Specialized methodological skills should be highlighted for accurate assignment.
Quality and Timeliness
Clear expectations help reviewers and editors work efficiently.
Reviews should focus on scientific rigor, clinical relevance, and data transparency. Provide specific comments that help authors improve the manuscript.
Timely completion of reviews supports author satisfaction and publication speed.
If you are unable to accept a review, respond promptly so that another reviewer can be assigned.
Concise, well structured reviews are most helpful for authors and editors.
Use a consistent structure to help editors evaluate reviewer input efficiently.
Focus on evidence based critique rather than stylistic preferences.
Timely responses help maintain the targeted review timeline.
Clear reviewer summaries support faster editorial decisions.
Consistency in review tone supports author engagement.
Consistent reviewer activity helps sustain reliable decision timelines.
Editorial Inquiries
Contact the editorial team for guidance on policies, submissions, or special issues
[email protected]Email Your Reviewer Profile
Share your expertise and availability with the editorial office.
