International Journal of Translational Research
We encourage responsible data sharing that balances openness with privacy and regulatory requirements.
Responsible Data Sharing
Data transparency strengthens translational research by enabling verification and reuse.
All submissions require a data availability statement. Authors should describe where data are stored, how they can be accessed, or why access is restricted.
- Data publicly available in a repository with a persistent identifier
- Data available from the corresponding author on reasonable request
- Data restricted due to ethical or privacy constraints with access under agreement
- Data included within the article and supplementary files
Include repository DOIs when available and provide clear access terms to support reuse.
Data sharing should never compromise participant privacy. When restrictions apply, transparency about access conditions is essential.
Recommended Data Repositories
Select repositories that support stable access, metadata quality, and persistent identifiers.
General Repositories
Zenodo, Figshare, Dryad, and OSF for broad research datasets.
Clinical Data
Controlled access platforms suitable for sensitive clinical or clinical data.
Molecular Data
Specialized archives for genomic, proteomic, or metabolomic data.
Institutional Repositories
University repositories with stable links and institutional governance.
Trial Registries
Protocol transparency and dataset linkage for clinical trials.
Code Repositories
Git based or archive services for scripts and analytical workflows.
Protecting Participants
Responsible sharing requires privacy safeguards and documented consent.
- Remove personal identifiers and sensitive metadata
- Confirm consent for data sharing where applicable
- Use controlled access for sensitive clinical datasets
- Describe any embargo periods or access conditions
For imaging data, remove identifiers in file headers and confirm publication consent for any patient images.
Clear data documentation improves reuse, citation, and trust in the findings.
If custom code or statistical scripts were used, consider depositing them alongside datasets with version information and dependencies.
Make Data Findable and Reusable
FAIR aligned data practices improve long term value and citation of datasets.
Provide descriptive metadata, variable definitions, and codebooks. Use consistent naming conventions and include units for all variables.
Cite datasets in the reference list when possible to ensure proper attribution and track reuse.
If data are shared under a specific license, include the license terms and reuse conditions in the data availability statement.
Consistent metadata improves discovery and reuse across repositories.
Attribution and Tracking
Citing datasets ensures recognition for data creation and supports reuse tracking.
Include dataset identifiers in the reference list and link them in the data availability statement. This supports persistent access and credit for data contributors.
For multi site studies, clearly document ownership and stewardship of shared datasets to avoid access conflicts.
If data are derived from proprietary sources, describe the restrictions and provide a pathway for qualified access when possible.
Clear citation of datasets helps indexing services connect articles with supporting resources.
When possible, cite both dataset and code repositories to support full reproducibility.
Clear Language for Data Availability
Well written statements help readers understand how to access supporting data.
Use specific repository names and identifiers rather than generic statements. This improves trust and ensures that readers can locate data efficiently.
If data are restricted, explain the reason and outline the steps required for access approval.
When data are included as supplementary files, describe the content and file formats so readers can interpret and reuse the material.
If licensing restrictions apply, include the license terms and any reuse limitations in the statement.
Clear data access language reduces follow up requests during review and supports compliance with funder policies.
Authors should ensure that repository links remain active and that access requirements are documented clearly.
Data statements should align with ethics approvals and consent conditions.
Clearly noted embargo dates help readers plan access.
Data access clarity reduces reviewer follow up requests.
Data Sharing Benefits
Transparent data practices improve reproducibility and impact for translational research.
Editorial Inquiries
Contact the editorial team for guidance on policies, submissions, or special issues
[email protected]Prepare a Data Ready Submission
Include a data availability statement and share your methods clearly for faster review.