International Journal of Thorax

International Journal of Thorax

International Journal of Thorax – Editorial Policies

Open Access & Peer-Reviewed

Submit Manuscript
Breathe Life Into Your Research

International Journal of Thorax - Editorial Policies

Clear policies that protect research integrity

Core Editorial Standards

International Journal of Thorax follows rigorous editorial policies to ensure fairness, transparency, and research integrity across all submissions.

Policies guide peer review, ethics compliance, conflicts of interest, data transparency, and corrections.

All manuscripts undergo editorial screening and peer review by subject experts. Decisions are based on methodological quality, originality, and relevance.

Ethical approval is required for human or animal derived materials, and authors must disclose conflicts of interest.

Plagiarism screening is performed for all submissions. Suspected misconduct is handled in accordance with publishing ethics guidance.

Corrections, expressions of concern, or retractions are issued when necessary to protect the scholarly record.

Preprint posting is permitted when disclosed at submission, and authors should update preprint records after acceptance.

Policies are reviewed periodically to reflect changes in ethical guidance and data sharing expectations.

Reviewer comments and manuscript content remain confidential throughout the review process.

Editors must manage conflicts of interest and recuse themselves when impartiality could be compromised.

Studies involving human samples should describe consent procedures and approvals clearly.

Data availability statements are required for all submissions and should describe access conditions clearly.

Authorship disputes are handled using documented contribution roles and institutional guidance when needed.

Ethical breaches may result in rejection, correction, or retraction with public notice in line with COPE guidance.

All authors must meet contribution standards and approve the final manuscript.

Submissions must be original and not under review elsewhere.

Data integrity concerns may prompt requests for raw data or documentation.

Corrections and retractions are issued transparently when required.

Appeals are reviewed with clear scientific justification and editorial oversight.

Confidentiality is required for reviewers and editors throughout the process.

Preprint disclosures should be included at submission and updated after acceptance.

Policies align with recognized publishing ethics guidance and best practices.

The journal follows clear authorship criteria to prevent guest or ghost authorship.

Conflicts of interest must be disclosed for authors, reviewers, and editors.

Ethics approvals are required for studies using human or animal derived materials and must be stated.

Research involving human samples must comply with consent and institutional guidelines.

Image integrity checks may be performed to detect inappropriate manipulation.

Policy Quick View

  • Originality required for all submissions
  • Ethics approvals required
  • Conflicts of interest disclosed
  • Data availability statement required
  • Similarity screening applied
  • Confidential peer review maintained
  • Corrections and retractions managed transparently
  • Appeals reviewed with oversight

Policy Highlights

Merit Based Decisions

Editorial decisions are based on scientific quality and relevance.

Ethics Compliance

Human and animal related studies must meet ethical standards.

Conflict Disclosure

Authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose conflicts.

Data Transparency

Data availability statements are required for all submissions.

Policy Areas

Key policy areas ensure responsible publishing.

Integrity and Transparency

Required

Policies address originality, authorship, data integrity, and data deposition documentation.

  • Original work only
  • Authorship contributions documented
  • Data integrity required
  • Repository documentation when applicable

Corrections and Appeals

Accountability

Clear processes for corrections, retractions, and author appeals.

  • Corrections published transparently
  • Appeals reviewed by editorial leadership
  • Misconduct investigated fairly
  • Confidentiality maintained

Policy Checklist

Snapshot

Keep these core expectations in place at submission.

Quick Table

Policy AreaRequirementAuthor Action
OriginalityNo prior publicationDisclose preprints
EthicsApprovals and complianceInclude identifiers
DataAvailability statementProvide links or access terms

Ethics and Consent

Ethics approvals are required for studies using human or animal derived materials.

Corrections and Misconduct

Concerns are handled through transparent corrections, expressions of concern, or retractions.

Policy Compliance

Step 1

Ethics and Consent

Provide IRB or IACUC approvals where required.

Step 2

Conflict Disclosure

Disclose financial or professional conflicts of interest.

Step 3

Data Statements

Include data availability statements and supporting documentation.

Additional Guidance

Policies protect the credibility of thoracic and respiratory research.

Confidentiality is required throughout review.

Concerns should be raised early for transparent resolution.

Author FAQs

Are preprints allowed?
Yes. Disclose preprints at submission and update records after acceptance.
How are misconduct cases handled?
We follow COPE guidance and investigate cases fairly.
Can authors appeal decisions?
Yes. Appeals are reviewed with clear scientific justification.

Submit Your Manuscript

Publish with rigorous editorial standards and open access visibility.

Submit via ManuscriptZone Simple Manuscript Submission
Need help? Contact us at [email protected]